¶1I concur in affirming the judgment. There is no ground, in my judgment, whatever, for disallowing the plaintiff’s fees for professional services in the Slocum case.
¶2Judgment affirmed.
¶3Peckham, Miller and Hogeboom, Justices.]
54 Barb. 425
Davis v. Peck
Decided March 4, 1867
New York Supreme Court · decided 1867-03-04
THIS action was tried before T. Odell, Esq., as salé referee. It was brought to recover the amount of certain promissory notes, executed by the defendant to the plaintiff, for money loaned by the plaintiff to the defendant upon his (the plaintiff’s) checks, and for services rendered by the plaintiff for the defendant as attorney and counsel.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1867-03-04
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1907
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →