Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 Cal. 3d 1032 - People v. Bennett

54 Cal. 3d 1032 - People v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably 6 Cal. 4th 1199 - People v. Ochoa (1993), People v. Fields (1996)

4 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

260199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 30 Cal. 3d 290 - People v. Watson · 24 Cal. 3d 890 - Taylor v. Superior Court · 40 Cal. 2d 160 - People v. Costa · People v. McNiece · 172 Cal. App. 3d 984 - People v. Olivas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[g]ross negligence is the exercise of so slight a degree of care as to raise a presumption of conscious indifference to the consequences. [Citation.] `The state of mind of a person who acts with conscious indifferences to the consequences is simply,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “' [Citation.] The test is objective: whether a reasonable person in the defendant's position would have been aware of the risk involved. [Citation.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'The state of mind of a person who acts with conscious indifferences to the consequences is simply, "I don't care what happens.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.