¶1The facts in this case are in all essentials parallel to those shown by the record in Brigden et al. v. Dodge et al., ante, p. 266 [201 Pac. 631]. Pursuant to stipulation, both cases were submitted on the same briefs.
¶2For the same reasons as those stated in the opinion filed in Brigden et al. v. Dodge et al. the judgment herein is affirmed.
¶3A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was- denied by the supreme court on November 17, 1921.
¶4Lennon, J., Sloane, J., and Shurtleff, J., concurred.
¶5Wilbur, J., dissented.
¶6Shaw, J., did not participate.