Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 CALAPP2D 637 - In re White

In re White’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
September 1986
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 1986 · most notably Roche v. Roche (1944), Stewart v. Stewart (1953)

46 state decisions

20019421950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 55 Cal. App. 114 - Newby v. Newby · 108 Cal. App. 716 - In Re Livingston · 34 Cal. App. 290 - In Re Holt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The right of a parent to the care and custody of a child cannot be taken away merely because the court may believe that some third person can give the child better care and greater protection.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well settled that, under the provisions of Section 1751 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the father or mother of a minor child under the age of fourteen years, if found by the court competent to discharge the duties of guardianship, is entitled to be appointed guardian in preference to any other person, and that the court must appoint a parent seeking to be appointed, unless it finds such parent incompetent, notwithstanding the judge is of the opinion that the child's health and welfare may be promoted by giving it to another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The father and mother of a legitimate unmarried minor child are equally entitled to its custody, services and earnings. If either the father or mother be dead or unable or refuse to take the custody or has abandoned his or her family, the other is entitled to its custody, services and earnings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.