Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 CONNAPP 26 - State v. James

State v. James’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2022

18 state decisions

1301999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Phillips · Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · State v. Williams · Goldstein v. Garrity · Vereen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To convict the defendant of manslaughter in the first degree, the state was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that (1) the defendant intended to cause serious physical injury to the victim and (2) he caused [the victim's] death.... The intent to cause serious physical injury required for a conviction of manslaughter in the first degree under 53a-55 (a) (1), by definition, require[s] a jury's finding that the defendant caused a physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function of a bodily organ.... A person's intent may be inferred from his conduct, as well as the surrounding circumstances, and is an issue for the trier of fact to decide.... [A] factfinder may infer an intent to cause serious physical injury from circumstantial evidence such as the type of weapon used, the manner in which it was used, the type of wound inflicted and the events leading up to and immediately following the incident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when: (1) [w]ith intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he causes the death of such person or of a third person ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.