Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 F.1d 181 - Stevens v. The City of New York

Stevens v. The City of New York’s Empirical Analysis

54 F. 181 · 1893

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
November 1982
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1982

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

401893190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Nevada v. Quick · Patterson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The measure of care to he exercised by a steamship in the use of her propellers differs under different circumstances; and the same rule of law which would exonerate an employer from the consequences of an injury to a servant caused by a risk inherent in the service which the latter was hired to perform will exonerate a steamship from responsibility for an injury caused by a similar risk received by a tug while in its employ. It is the duty of the employer to use due care to avoid exposing the servant to extraordinary risks which the latter cannot reasonably anticipate; but he is not bound to provide against the risks which are necessarily incident to the service to be rendered. These are implied conditions of the contract of hiring, and there is no reason why 'they are not as applicable to the relation of steamship and tug as to that of ordinary master and servant””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the case is one where a vessel, having agreed to do a particular duty, and familiar with all its ordinary incidents, thrust herself unnecessarily into a position where she was injured by just such a risk as she should have anticipated”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.