Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 F.1d 334 - In re Sing Lee

In re Sing Lee’s Empirical Analysis

54 F. 334 · 1893

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
November 1910
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1910

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

40189319001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on John Den James Murray and John Kayser v. The Hoboken Land and Improvement Company John Den James B Murray et al. · Chae Chan Ping v. United States · Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States · Walker v. Sauvinet · Oteiza v. Jacobus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The person brought before the commissioner is one of a class which, by the terms of the statute, is obnoxious to its operation. That must appear before the general jurisdiction can be exorcised, and since, generally, that class is interdicted, lie can only escape the common lot upon its appearing that he is not within the general condemnation. The moans of showing this are presumably in his own control. It would be extremely inconvenient, and probably in most instances impracticable, for the government to bring proof of the" negative fact that the respondent is not within the exemption. Such circumstances are the basis of the rule of evidence which devolves the burden on the party who presumably lias the best means of proving the fact; but. whatever the rule which by tbe common law would be applicable to trials, it cannot be affirmed that in such conditions the legislature cannot prescribe such a rule of evidence."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.