Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 F.1d 913 - Dufour v. Lang

Dufour v. Lang’s Empirical Analysis

54 F. 913 · 1892

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1979
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1979

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

30189219001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Forgay v. Conrad · St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co. · Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff · Agawam Company v. Jordan · Hardee v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The requirement of rule 11 (11 C. C. A. cii., 47 Fed. vi.), that the assignment of errors shall he filed ‘with the clerk of the court below, with the petition for the writ of error or appeal,’ was designed to bring into the record at that time a separate and particular statement ‘of each error asserted and intended to be urged’; and to a large extent the rule is a nullity if, under general and indefinite specifications like those quoted, the appellant may be able afterwards to bring forward objections to the decree or judgment, which, when error was assigned, had not been thought of.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The purpose of the rule is two-fold, — to advise the adversary as to what he is to defend, and to aid the appellate court in reviewing the case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.