Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 F.2d 16 - Kaminsky v. Phinizy

Kaminsky v. Phinizy’s Empirical Analysis

54 F.2d 16 · 1931

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1943
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110

Relies on Graham v. Railroad Co. · McDonald v. Williams · Fitzpatrick v. McGregor · 15 Ga. App. 69 - Henderson v. Maysville Guano Co. · Rosenheim Shoe Co. v. Horne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““What is meant by ‘the-minimum capital stock’ is the lowest amount named where the charter states that the capital shall be a stated sum with the privilege of increase. Rosenheim Shoe Co. v. Horne, 10 Ga. App. 582, 587 , 73 S. E. 953 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.