Tavarez v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
54 F.3d 109 · 1995
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Williams v. Hill (1996), Kelly v. Serna (1996)
17 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Heck v. Humphrey · Neitzke v. Williams · Butz v. Economou · Carlson v. Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n order to recover from damages for allegedly unconstitutional conviction or imprisonment, or for other harm caused by actions whose unlawfulness would render a conviction or sentence invalid, a § 1983 plaintiff must prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or called into question by a federal court’s writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the two actions share the same 'practicalities of litigation,’ ..., federal courts have typically incorporated § 1983 law into Bivens actions.” Id. (citations omitted). 3 . Count 4 of Parsons's complaint, for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to deprive plaintiff of a constitutional right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.