Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 F.3d 111 - Montauk Oil Transportation Corp. v. Tug "El Zorro Grande"

Montauk Oil Transportation Corp. v. Tug "El Zorro Grande"’s Empirical Analysis

54 F.3d 111 · 1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2012

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

30199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1321

Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Alder v. United States · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · Gerry v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not predicated upon the cost of removal, but upon the happening of the discharge. The determinative factor ... is the discharge of oil, not its cleanup,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.