Antwine v. Delo’s Empirical Analysis
54 F.3d 1357 · 1995
Citation profile
64 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably State v. Storey (1995), Goode v. Shoukfeh (1997)
64 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Teague v. Lane · Wainwright v. Witt · Swain v. State of Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Measure the type of prejudice that arose from the argument; (2) examine what defense counsel did in his [or her] argument to minimize prejudice; (3) review jury instructions .to see if the jury was properly instructed; and (4) determine if there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the sentencing phase would have been different, taking into account all the aggravating and mitigating circumstances.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The issue is whether the failure to discover and present evidence of [defendant's] mental condition undermines our confidence in the outcome of . . . the trial. We are concerned, then, with whether the jury--not the motion court--would have found the evidence of [defendant's] mental condition credible.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[S]trategic choices made after less than complete investigation are reasonable to the extent that reasonable professional judgments support the limitations on investigation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.