Raytech Corporation v. White’s Empirical Analysis
54 F.3d 187 · 1995
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 11 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. (2006), Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc. (2010)
19 federal appellate · 11 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1412
Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Montana v. United States · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie · James Talcott, Inc. v. Allahabad Bank, Ltd., Bank of Baroda, Ltd., Bank of Tokyo, City Trade & Industries, Ltd., Defendant-Third-Party v. New Central Jute Mills Company, Ltd., Third-Party
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the identical issue was previously adjudicated; (2) the issue was actually litigated; (3) the previous determination was necessary to the decision; and (4) the party being precluded from relitigating the issue was fully represented in the prior action.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t was not the failure or the inadequacy of consideration proffered by Rayteeh for the purchase of [Raymark Industries’] profitable assets that so deeply troubled the court in Schmoll; instead the court viewed the transaction as rife with improper intent, due in part to the type of consideration passed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the fraudulent transfer exception, [in] the law [of] every jurisdiction . . . requires a finding that the corporate transfer of assets 'is for the fraudulent purpose of escaping liability.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.