Miles v. Burris’s Empirical Analysis
54 F.3d 284 · 1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Ohio v. Roberts · Dutton v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the limited purpose of explaining why a government investigation was undertaken”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Yancey v. Gilmore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.