Upshaw v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis
54 F.3d 718 · 1995
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Picard v. Connor · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · Gissendanner v. State · One Lear Jet Aircraft v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ground for denial of the claim. Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 , 750, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 2565, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991). 3 In order to be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Upshaw v. Singletary“for failure to follow state procedural rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Upshaw v. Singletary
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.