Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

54 F.3d 772

Docket No. 93-7229.

Willie Walter Butler v. David K. Smith

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 7, 1995. Decided May 16, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-05-16

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 1996 · most notably Tanca v. Nordberg (1996), Burton v. State (1995)

24 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-05-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Willie Walter Butler, appellant pro se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Mary Christine Maggard, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court.* Butler v. Smith, No. CA-92-210-R (W.D.Va., Oct. 26, 1993). We modify the district court's order to reflect that the dismissal of Appellant's due process claim was without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2106 (1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AS MODIFIED

*

We note that the district court correctly concluded that Appellee accurately calculated Appellant's sentence. The petition was therefore properly subject to summary judgment

/54/f3d/772 · .json · Public domain