Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

54 F.3d 773

Docket No. 94-7461.

Horak v. Painter

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 20, 1995. Decided: May 19, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-05-19

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mitchell v. Starns-Williams

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-05-19

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Raybon Horak, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Horak v. Painter, No. CA-94-961 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/54/f3d/773 · .json · Public domain