Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

54 F.3d 774

Docket No. 94-7213.

Plyler v. Evatt

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted April 25, 1995. Decided May 16, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-05-16

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Roberson v. Henson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-05-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2022

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

301995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Harry Plyler, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Plyler v. Evatt, No. CA-91-784-3-22-BD (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/54/f3d/774 · .json · Public domain