Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

54 F.3d 774

Docket No. 95-1308.

Steinberg v. Harris

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted April 20, 1995. Decided May 22, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-05-22

Relies on Roberson v. Henson

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-05-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Murray L. Steinberg, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint against a Virginia circuit court judge in which he asserts various constitutional violations and an invasion of privacy. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Steinberg v. Harris, No. CA-95-107-R (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for injunctive relief

/54/f3d/774 · .json · Public domain