Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 F.3d 888 - MacLeod v. Interstate Commerce Commission

MacLeod v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis

54 F.3d 888 · 1995

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2024

14 federal appellate · 1 district ·

801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade · Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Trucking Associations · Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corp. · San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will not reach out to examine a decision made after the one actually under review.... An agency's decision is not arbitrary and capricious merely because it is not followed in a later adjudication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the clear implication of [49 C.F.R. § 1312] is that unless a carrier adopts the rates filed by its predecessor under a different name, it will have no rate on file.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “on the ground that the regulation there specifically provided that absent proper participation, a carrier's tariff is 'void as a matter of law,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.