Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

54 F. App'x 145

Tyner v. Sizer

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-12-31

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Rose v. Lee · Barajas-Aguilar v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-12-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Donald J. Tyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) . An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability -will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000); see Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001) . We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Tyner has not made the requisite showing. See Tyner v. Sizer, No. CA-00-1426-L (D. Md. June 28, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED

/54/fappx/145 · .json · Public domain