Gordon v. Conley

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-12-31

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-12-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*157 PER CURIAM.

¶1 Kevin M. Gordon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend the court’s previous judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gordon v. Conley, No. CA-99-204-5 (S.D.W.Va. July 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

¶3 To the extent Gordon appeals the district court order denying relief under § 2241, his notice of appeal is untimely.