Stonecipher v. Sexton’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2003
7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hanson v. Denckla · 62 Wash. 2d 106 - Tyee Construction Co. v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc. · Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L. E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe and Thomas J. Masterson · Woodring v. Hall · Tilley v. Keller Truck & Implement Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although each case must be decided on the peculiar facts presented, the Kansas court has made it abundantly clear the long arm statute was intended to permit in personam jurisdiction only in those fact situations which fall within the confines of the substantive due process requirements. Essentially, the same factors which enter into a determination of whether the literal requirements of the long arm statute have been met, are involved in deciding whether the concepts of due process . . . have been satisfied.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Consequently, that particular subsection of the statute can have no application to the case under consideration.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.