State v. Kimball’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 district · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably State v. Kotis (1999), State v. Vance (1979)
2 district · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Giaccio v. State of Pennsylvania · Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham · State v. Grahovac
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Notwithstanding the fact that a preempted ordinance is void and incapable of supporting a valid arrest, if the defendant's conduct is also violative of a similar state statute, the arrest may nevertheless be valid. That being the situation here, it is of no effect that the arresting officer had the ordinance in mind rather than the statute when effecting the arrest. [2] The point of importance is that the facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge afforded probable cause to arrest under either the ordinance or the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kimball v. Sadaoka“"Justice Abe in his dissenting opinion raises the following issue: A police officer cannot arrest an offender without a warrant of arrest if the officer had not, prior to the arrest, received `a complaint by the principal or other person in charge.' "The appellant's appeal, however, was premised strictly on constitutional grounds. "Supreme Court Rule 3(b)(3) provides that questions not presented in appellant's brief on appeal will be disregarded." 54 Haw. at 91 , 503 P.2d at 181 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Kimball v. Sadaoka“"Any person intruding, or loitering, or loafing, or idling, without proper authority upon the premises of any school, public or private, including any female boarding school, Kawailoa Girls' Home and school dormitories, may be arrested by any police officer, without any warrant, and on the complaint of the principal or other person in charge of the school, or of any trustee of the same." HRS § 727-24.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kimball v. Sadaoka
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.