54 Ill. App. 2d 393 - Celano v. Frederick’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(f) When Proceeding Terminated. A proceeding under this rule continues until terminated by motion of the judgment creditor, order of the court, or satisfaction of the judgment, but termi nates automatically 6 months from the date of (1) the respondent’s first personal appearance pursuant to the citation or (2) the respondent’s first personal appearance pursuant to subsequent process issued to enforce the citation, whichever is sooner. The court may, however, grant extensions beyond the 6 months, as justice may require. Orders for the payment of money continue in effect notwithstanding the termination of the proceedings until the judgment is satisfied or the court orders otherwise, (emphasis added) ¶ 2-1402(d)(l), (2), Ill.Ann.Stat., Ch. 110 (Supplementary proceedings) provides in pertinent part: (d)(1) The citation may prohibit the party to whom it is directed from making or allowing any transfer or other disposition of, or interfering with, any property ... belonging to the judgment debtor ... until the further order of the court or the termination of the proceeding, whichever occurs first. (2) The court may enjoin any person, whether or not a party to the supplementary proceeding, from making or allowing any transfer or other disposition of, or interference with, the property of the judgment debtor, or the property or debt concerning which any person is required to attend and be examined until further direction in the premises. The injunction order shall remain in effect un”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Fowler

2. ““Rule 24 requires all parties cited to appear for examination before the court, master, notary,, etc., and to produce books and records concerning property or income of the debtor. (Par. (3).) That this could cause undue hardship is recognized in the rule itself when it directs the court to control the proceedings ‘to the end that the rights and interests of all parties and persons involved may be protected and harassment avoided.’ (Par. (5).) Further, a second or subsequent supplementary proceeding with respect to the same judgment may not be commenced without leave of, court, and then only upon a showing under oath that the creditor is acting in good faith ‘and not to harass the judgment debtor or third party.’ (Par. (1).) Paragraph (4) also protects a third party from being compelléd to appear in an inconvenient forum.” 54 Ill. App. 2d 393 ,403 n.5.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 100 Ill. App. 3d 107 - Kauk v. Matthews

3. “use his license to practice law as a shield to protect himself from the consequences of his participation [in assisting a client in the commission of a tort].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 354 Ill. App. 3d 930 - Kopka v. Kamensky and Rubenstein