Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 KAN 683 - State v. Rogers

State v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
January 1981
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1981

9 state decisions

401895190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. . Richards · Place v. . Minster · People v. Young · Phillips v. State · Orrell v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every person who shall be convicted of breaking and entering in the night-time — First, any building within the curtilage of a dwelling-house, but not forming a part thereof; or, second, any shop, store, booth, tent, warehouse or other building, or any boat or vessel, in which there shall be at the time some human being, or any goods, wares or merchandise, or other valuable thing, kept or deposited, with intent to steal or commit any felony therein, shall on conviction be adjudged guilty of burglary in the second degree.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Can we assume that the jury gave credit to the testimony of one or of a number of witnesses rather than to another? By what process of reasoning can we reach the conclusion that the conviction of the defendant is really based on the competent testimony rather than the incompetent?” (p. 695.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““We think the legislature intended to include buildings of other classes than those specifically mentioned. We are very clear that banks, offices, and buildings used for many other purposes, are within the protection of the statute if valuable things are kept in them.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.