Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 Md. App. 673 - Rosenberg v. State

54 Md. App. 673 - Rosenberg v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2002

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

80198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Adams v. State of Maryland · Lutz v. State · United States v. Kenneth L. Musgrave and Marshall Womack

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Maintaining a bawdy house encompasses regenerating criminal conduct. That conduct in some instances may not be detected because of the secluded environment in which it occurs. As Rosenberg well knows, it would have been impossible for the State to set forth the date upon which each and every illegal sexual act was culminated. We think the time in which the offenses occurred was described “as particularly as possible” and certainly put Rosenberg at no disadvantage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In Maryland a conviction of a conspirator will stand even though the coconspirator is subsequently acquitted, but the prior acquittal of a eoconspirator mandates the acquittal of a subsequently tried conspirator.” (Footnote omitted) (Emphasis omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.