¶1The controlling facts herein are substantially the same as in Linton v. Cooper, 54 Neb. 438, decided herewith, and for the reason stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment is
¶2Affirmed.
54 Neb. 443
Decided April 8, 1898
Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1898-04-08
<p>Process: Witness: Non-Resident. A party to a suit, or a witness at the trial, who is a non-resident of this state, is privileged from the service of summons in this state not only while necessarily and in good faith in attendance upon the court, but for a reasonable time after the hearing, to prepare for his departure and return to his home.</p>
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1913
6 state decisions
Relies on Linton v. Cooper
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1898-04-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The controlling facts herein are substantially the same as in Linton v. Cooper, 54 Neb. 438, decided herewith, and for the reason stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment is
¶2Affirmed.