Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

54 N.H. 431

State v. Hunt

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 1, 1874

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1874-07-01

Information in the nature of a quo warranto, filed by the attorney-general at the relation of Daniel W. Lane against Nathan P. Hunt, alleging in substance that the returns of votes given in the several towns in the county of Hillsborough, at the annual election in March, 1874, for the office of comity treasurer for the ensuing political year, were made out, signed, certified, sealed, directed, and transmitted to the clerk of the supreme court for said county, as required by…

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1909

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1874-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hibbard, J.

¶1Chapter 23 of the General Statutes provides, in sec. 1, for the choice of county officers; in sec. 5, for the counting of the votes by the supreme court; in sec. 7, that “ if any person chosen or appointed to either of said offices declines to accept, removes from the county, resigns, dies, or becomes insane, or when there is manifest hazard to the public interest, said court may declare the office vacant; ” and in sec. 8, that “ in any case of vacancy the supreme court shall appoint a commissioner to perform the duties of the office, who shall be subject to the requirements and liabilities, and entitled to the privi*433leges and emoluments of such office during the vacancyand we are all clearly of the opinion that Mr. Hutchinson was “ chosen ” county treasurer at the annual election in March, 1874 ; that, by reason of his death after he was chosen, the court had authority to “ declare the office vacant; ” that the appointment of Mr. Lane to fill the vacancy was valid; and that he is authorized “ to perform the duties ” “ and entitled to the privileges ” of the office.

¶2Demurrer overruled.

/54/nh/431 · .json · Public domain