Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 N.M. 296 - Newbold v. Florance

Newbold v. Florance’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 1978
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1978

16 state decisions

100195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paulos v. Janetakos · Hudson v. Herschbach Drilling Co. · Tocci v. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co. · Frazier v. Ray · Armijo v. Henry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * A new cause of action may be alleged in an amended complaint, provided it is founded on facts not wholly foreign to the facts originally pleaded. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.