54 Ohio App. 2d 25 - Garrett v. Garrett’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2025
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 39 Ohio App. 2d 97 - Adomeit v. Baltimore · 141 Ohio St. 432 - In Re Kurtzhalz · 140 Ohio St. 535 - State Ex Rel. Buck v. McCabe · 46 Ohio App. 2d 157 - Majnaric v. Majnaric · 40 Ohio App. 2d 129 - Vavrina v. Greczanik
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n appellate court will not find error `unless it clearly appears, from all the facts and circumstances, that there has been an abuse of discretion, operating to the prejudice of the party in the final determination of the case.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The decision whether to grant a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.