Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

54 Okla. 22

153 P 678

Akin v. Bonfils

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1915

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1915-12-07

<p>APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Affirmance. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pae. ix), the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.-</p> <p>(Syllabus by Dudley, C.)</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1949

1 state decisions

Relies on Nicholson v. Barnes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1915-12-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 . Opinion by

DUDLEY,-C.

¶2 The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case were filed in this court on April 8, 1914. Neither party has filed • a brief, *23 nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

/54/okla/22 · .json · Public domain