Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 Or. App. 41 - State v. Crumal

54 Or. App. 41 - State v. Crumal’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2010

8 state decisions

601981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the most reasonable inference is that the carrying of the proscribed weapon be such that the weapon move with the perambulation of the body.” The court was influenced, at least in part, by the fact that a related provision specifically prohibited carrying a firearm in a vehicle. However, we have found no other case defining”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.