Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 P3D 188 - Beebe v. Moses

Beebe v. Moses’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rowland v. Christian · Nelson v. Freeland · State v. Peterson · State v. Tomal · 93 Wash. 2d 127 - Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[t]he ultimate goal is to differentiate (1) an entry made for a business or economic purpose that benefits both entrant and occupier, from (2) an entry made for a purpose that either (a) benefits only the entrant or (b) is primarily familial or social.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.