State v. Dean’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2020
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 87 Wash. 2d 922 - Johnson v. Morris · 109 Wash. 2d 947 - Allingham v. City of Seattle · In Re Goodwin · 111 Wash. 2d 353 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] decision as to whether a prior conviction shall be included in an individual's offender score should be determined by the law in effect on the day the current offense was committed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Lathrop · State v. Varga“NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature considers the majority opinions in State v. Cruz, 139 Wash.2d 186 , 985 P.2d 384 (1999), and State v. Smith, Cause No. 70683-2 (September 6, 2001), to be wrongly decided, since neither properly interpreted legislative intent. When the legislature enacted the sentencing reform act, chapter 9.94A RCW, and each time the legislature has amended the act, the legislature intended that an offender's criminal history and offender score be determined using the statutory provisions that were in effect on the day the current offense was committed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Smith · In Re Jones“[a]ny sentence imposed under this chapter shall be determined in accordance with the law in effect when the current offense was committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Lathrop
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.