Lundy v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1983
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Molyneaux v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The income considered available to the dependent or dependents applying for or receiving assistance will be arrived at by deducting allowances for Ms living expenses from the income of the spouse or parent. The following method which is applicable to the situations will be used. (2) Others. For others the following apply: (i) The dependents of the spouse or parent will be determined. Dependents without income and not receiving assistance will always be included. Dependents with income of their own may be included if the spouse or parent wants and if the income of the dependent is combined with that of the spouse or parent. (ii) The total net income for the spouse or parent and his NA dependents will be computed as if they are a separate assistance unit, using the method in subsection (d) (1)-(2) (iii) The following will be deducted from the total net income: (A) The difference between the family size allowances for the assistance unit, excluding special need allowances, and what the allowances would be if the spouse or parent and his allowable dependents were included. (B) The actual cost of medical care for the spouse or parent and his allowable dependents. This will include premiums for medical insurance such-as Blue Cross, Blue Shield, and the like. (C) The actual cost of life insurance up to $2.00 per month per person for the spouse or parent and his allowable dependents. (D) Payment of a court order by the spouse or parent for a person not living with him. (3) Remainder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.