Haddon v. Lenhardt’s Empirical Analysis
1899
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1923
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The order of the Probate.Court to sell the land in aid of assets was binding upon all who were made parties to that proceeding. The necessary effect of that order was to destroy the right of the parties to that proceeding to claim the homestead in the land ordered to be sold.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bradley v. Calhoun““We are unable to see why persons who are made parties to an action are not as fully concluded by a judgment the necessary effect of which is to destroy their right of homestead' as they would be in any other case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bradley v. Calhoun
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.