Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 SD 184 - Larson v. Nelson

Larson v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
February 1965
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1965

10 state decisions

3019291930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glass v. Bennett · State v. Caddy · Vassilos v. Arnold · First State Bank v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is clear that a will contest is a proceeding, and respondent, being a party to the record, was subject to be called and examined as an adverse witness, and it was error to sustain the objection made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.