Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 SO3D 310 - Timms v. State

Timms v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Old Chief v. United States · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 986 So. 2d 951 - Archer v. State · 806 So. 2d 185 - Randall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where evidence of a prior conviction is a necessary element of the crime for which the defendant is on trial (i.e., pos session of firearm by a convicted felon), but evidence of the specific nature of the crime for which the defendant was previously convicted (i.e., armed robbery), is not an essential element of the crime for which the defendant is on trial ... the trial court should accept a defendant’s offer to stipulate and grant a limiting instruction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.