Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

54 So. 3d 567

Van Poyck v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 2, 2011

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-02-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2016

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-02-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal of an order denying a “Petition Seeking Compensation for Wrongful Incarceration.” The trial court dismissed the petition stating that Jeffrey H. Van Poyck had to initiate the application process for compensation with the Department of Legal Affairs pursuant to section 961.06(2). Thus, the petition was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. However, before such a petition may be filed, the petitioner must first establish that he was a “wrongfully incarcerated person” by filing a petition “with the original sentencing court” pursuant to section 961.03. Although the caption of the petition improperly delineated the relief sought, in the “wherefore” clause, Van Poyck properly requested a finding of whether he was a “wrongfully incarcerated person.” We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to make such a determination.

¶2Reversed and remanded.

/54/so3d/567 · .json · Public domain