Suggs v. Suggs’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 537 So. 2d 463 - Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc. · 418 So. 2d 89 - Boshell v. Keith · 637 So. 2d 901 - Martin v. Martin · 686 So. 2d 1222 - Asam v. Devereaux · 864 So. 2d 317 - Tucker v. Cullman-Jefferson Counties Gas Dist.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This court has consistently held that ‘matters relating to child support “rest soundly within the trial court’s discretion, and will not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing that the ruling is not supported by the evidence and thus is plainly and palpably wrong.” ’ Scott v. Scott, 915 So.2d 577, 579 (Ala.Civ.App.2005) (quoting Bowen v. Bowen, 817 So.2d 717, 718 (Ala.Civ.App.2001)).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Irions v. Holt“without the standardized child-support forms required by Rule 32, we are unable to determine whether the trial court appropriately applied the child-support guidelines in establishing the award of child support”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.