Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 Va. App. 162 - Doering v. Doering

54 Va. App. 162 - Doering v. Doering’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 14 Va. App. 53 - Buchanan v. Buchanan · 40 Va. App. 255 - Congdon v. Congdon · 1 Va. App. 118 - Parra v. Parra · 42 Va. App. 557 - Newman v. Newman · Morris v. Morris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““limits the authority of a trial court to make or modify spousal support awards when an agreement exists. ‘In such cases, the intent of the parties as expressed in the agreement controls, and the agreement is treated as a contract and construed in the same manner as all contracts.’ White v. White, 257 Va. 139, 144 , 509 S.E.2d 323, 325 (1999). The statute was enacted to require that decrees for support honor agreements made by the parties; it prevents a court from rewriting the parties’ contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.