54 Va. App. 323 - Midkiff v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Aguilar v. Texas · Herring v. United States · Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York · United States v. Lacy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“were fair and accurate representations of the digital image files of child pornography on [Midkiff's] computer hard drive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Midkiff v. Com.“lose something, when you make a bit for bit image of a hard drive you get the exact same thing each time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Midkiff v. Com.“[e]ach copy you create from the original is considered forensically to be an original.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Midkiff v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.