54 Va. App. 388 - Simms v. Ruby Tuesdays, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Caplan v. Bogard · Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Hazelwood · 2 Va. App. 165 - Dublin Garment Co., Inc. v. Jones · Combs v. Virginia Electric & Power Co. · WEICHERT COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, INC. v. First Commercial Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no connection between the conditions under which the employer required the work to be performed and the assault by the co-workers”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the continued viability of the horseplay doctrine as set forth in Dublin.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“materially changed the `innocent victim of horseplay' law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.