Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 WASH 424 - Wick v. Rea

Wick v. Rea’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
April 1988
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 1988

24 state decisions

90190919101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Galpin v. Page · Peyton v. Peyton · Williams v. Pittock · Thompson v. Robbins · Rogers v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Otherwise the court acts without jurisdiction. The rule, as stated in 17 Ency. Plead. & Prac., 45, “ ‘The right to serve process by publication being of purely statutory creation and in derogation of the common law, the statutes authorizing such service must be strictly pursued in order to confer jurisdiction upon the court,’ “was adopted in Thompson v. Robbins, 32 Wash. 149 , 72 Pac. 1043 , and has been followed in the following cases: [Citing cases.]””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘That the plaintiff herein, Thurston County, Washington, is the lawful holder of said certificates of delinquency; that summons and application for a judgment have been served in this proceeding as required by the statutes of the state of Washington, and such statutes complied with in all other respects pertaining thereto; ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.