Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 Wash. 2d 388 - State v. Schoel

54 Wash. 2d 388 - State v. Schoel’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
3
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably 127 Wash. 2d 95 - State v. Gocken (1995), United States ex rel. Hetenyi v. Wilkins (1965)

2 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

30019591960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Green v. United States · State v. Vance · People v. Gilmore · State v. Ash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o person shall . . . be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “identical in thought, substance, and purpose.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"The underlying idea, one that is deeply ingrained in at least the Anglo-American system of jurisprudence, is that the State with all its resources and power should not be allowed to make repeated attempts to convict an individual for an alleged offense, thereby subjecting him to embarrassment, expense and ordeal and compelling him to live in a continuing state of anxiety and insecurity, as well as enhancing the possibility that even though innocent he may be found guilty."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.