Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 Wash. 2d 57 - Drake v. Smith

54 Wash. 2d 57 - Drake v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2003

6 state decisions

30195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hunter Land Co. v. Laugenour · Union Oil & Mining Co. v. Bowman · Tedford v. Wenatchee Reclamation District · Weitensteiner v. Engdahl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not agree with defendants’ contention that there is no evidence to support the finding that the pollution is permanent. There is evidence, which the trial court chose to believe, that defendants had no intention of removing the . . . debris from the stream, nor of removing the fills from the creek. This is sufficient to meet the test announced in Haveman v. Beulow, 36 Wn. (2d) 185, 217 P. (2d) 313 , 19 A.L.R. (2d) 763 (1950), wherein this court said: “The court was of the opinion that the damage to the land should be regarded as permanent, and that, by reason of the destruction of the wells for domestic uses, their respective farms had been depreciated in value. An injury of the kind in question may be permanent in a legal sense, though not coextensive with perpetual, unending or unchangeable. Union Oil & Mining Co. v. Bowman, 144 Okla. 54 , 289 Pac. 296 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.