Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 WASHAPP 110 - State v. Komok

State v. Komok’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1989
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 104 Wash. 2d 315 - State v. Holt · 90 Wash. 2d 584 - City of Seattle v. Buchanan · 68 Wash. 2d 748 - State v. Russell · 39 Wash. 2d 258 - State v. Olds · State v. Randall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Theft" means: (a) To wrongfully obtain or exert unauthorized control over the property or services of another or the value thereof, with intent to deprive him of such property or services;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to make unauthorized use or an unauthorized copy of records, information, data, trade secrets, or computer programs”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) To take the property or services of another”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.