Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 Wash. App. 178 - State v. Barrett

54 Wash. App. 178 - State v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably State v. JP (2003), 124 Wash. 2d 789 - PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co. (1994)

53 state decisions

320198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 50 Wash. App. 888 - State v. Vinyard · 52 Wash. App. 413 - State v. Steward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) In its dispositional order, the court shall require the respondent to make restitution to any persons who have suffered loss or damage as a result of the offense committed by the respondent. In addition, restitution may be ordered for loss or damage if the offender pleads guilty to a lesser offense or fewer offenses and agrees with the prosecutor's recommendation that the offender be required to pay restitution to a victim of an offense or offenses which, pursuant to a plea agreement, are not prosecuted. The payment of restitution shall be in addition to any punishment which is imposed pursuant to the other provisions of this chapter. The court may determine the amount, terms, and conditions of the restitution. Restitution may include the costs of counseling reasonably related to the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.