54 Wash. App. 75 - State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2015
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 99 Wash. 2d 501 - State v. Caliguri · 102 Wash. 2d 120 - State v. Rice · 37 Wash. App. 474 - State v. Bockman · 38 Wash. App. 831 - State v. Toomey · State v. Nikolich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he crime here did not require an intent to do more than the proscribed act. It required only manufacture or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver. Thus, although [the police informant] in effect had the permission of the police to manufacture the speed and arguably did so without a mens rea of criminal purpose, he nonetheless "committed the crime" for purposes of being a principal to support liability under the accomplice liability statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in the commission of a crime” and is in essence liability for that crime. State v. Peterson, 54 Wn. App. 75, 78 , 772 P.2d 513 , review denied, 113 Wn.2d 1007 (1989); RCW 9A.08.020(3). 5 In the original version Alsup said,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A person who is an accomplice in the commission of a crime is guilty of that crime whether present at the scene or not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.